The Psychology of Mutual Fund Managers and How Cognitive Biases Influence Investment Decisions

Introduction

Have you ever made a decision you later regretted? Perhaps influenced by a gut feeling or by what everyone else seemed to be doing? It happens to all of us, because after all, we're human. 

What might surprise you is that even highly experienced professionals, like mutual fund managers, who are entrusted with billions in investments, aren't immune to these subtle psychological traps. 

They, too, are susceptible to such cognitive biases. Those mental shortcuts that can sometimes lead us astray. In fact, reports have shown how pervasive these biases are. 

For instance, Barron's once highlighted that a significant percentage of investors admit to falling prey to confirmation bias, while a large number also acknowledge recency bias influencing their decisions. 

In this blog, we'll delve into how these biases can impact the decisions made by mutual fund managers and, more importantly, explore the structured processes and safeguards put in place to help curb potential errors.

Common Cognitive Biases Faced by Mutual Fund Managers

It’s easy to assume that professional mutual fund managers are purely rational beings, making decisions based solely on data and sophisticated models. 

However, they are as human as the rest of us, complete with the same cognitive quirks. Understanding these biases is the first step toward mitigating their impact.

1) Overconfidence Bias 

This is a big one. It leads mutual fund managers to believe they have superior information or predictive abilities, often more than they actually do. 

This can manifest in excessive trading, a belief that they can consistently "beat the market," and potentially, an erosion of mutual fund returns due to higher transaction costs. 

Think of a manager who consistently attributes successful calls to their skill and poor calls to "bad luck."

2) Confirmation Bias 

Imagine mutual fund managers who believe a particular stock or sector is poised for growth. 

Confirmation bias means these mutual fund managers might then actively seek out and give more weight to research, news articles, or analyst reports that support this pre-existing belief, while inadvertently discounting or ignoring information that contradicts it. 

This "cherry-picking" of data can lead to a skewed view of reality.

3) Anchoring Bias 

This bias occurs when mutual fund managers fixate on an initial piece of information (the "anchor"), even when new data suggests a different reality. 

For example, an initial earnings forecast might stick in their minds, making it difficult for them to fully adjust their valuation even if subsequent company performance or market conditions dramatically change. 

4) Loss Aversion 

The pain of losing money often feels more intense than the pleasure of gaining an equivalent amount. 

For mutual fund managers, this can lead to hesitating to cut losing positions, hoping for a turnaround, rather than objectively recognizing when to exit. 

Conversely, they might be quicker to sell winning positions to "lock in" profits, even if the asset still has significant upside potential. This imbalance can impact portfolio performance.

5) Herd Mentality 

This bias describes the tendency for mutual fund managers to follow the actions of a larger group, even if those actions aren't based on independent analysis. It’s the desire to "go with the flow" or the fear of missing out (FOMO). 

You might see this when there's a sudden swarm of investment into a particular popular sector or stock, not necessarily due to deep conviction but because everyone else seems to be doing it. 

This can lead to market bubbles or crowded trades that unravel quickly.

Systematic Processes to Reduce Bias Among Mutual Fund Managers

Recognizing that cognitive biases exist is one thing; actively working to mitigate them is another. 

Leading asset management companies employ systematic processes designed to create checks and balances, thereby reducing the influence of individual biases on investment decisions made by mutual fund managers.

1) Investment Committees 

One of the most effective ways to dilute individual bias is through collective decision-making. Investment committees bring together multiple mutual fund managers and analysts. 

Diverse perspectives challenge assumptions, require robust debate, and force individuals to articulate their reasoning, which can expose flaws or biases in their initial thinking. This collaborative environment acts as a natural filter.

2) Quantitative Models 

Relying solely on human intuition can be risky. Many firms integrate quantitative models to screen stocks objectively. 

These models use algorithms to analyze vast amounts of data, identifying opportunities or risks based on predefined criteria, rather than subjective interpretation. 

They can also implement "bias ratios" that flag when a portfolio might be overly concentrated due to a manager's strong conviction, prompting a review.

3) Pre-defined Risk Limits 

Establishing clear, non-negotiable risk limits acts as a crucial guardrail. 

These limits prevent overconcentration in single stocks or sectors and ensure that emotion-driven trades don't push the portfolio beyond acceptable risk parameters. 

For instance, a policy might dictate that no single stock can exceed 5% of the portfolio, regardless of mutual fund managers; conviction. This discipline helps maintain diversification.

4) Periodic Review

Regular, structured reviews of past decisions are vital. 

Quarterly post-mortems, where investment teams objectively analyze why certain trades worked or didn't work, can help uncover patterns of bias, such as decisions driven by overconfidence or anchoring to old information. 

This systematic self-reflection fosters continuous learning and helps refine future decision-making processes for mutual fund managers.

5) Process Engineering

This involves designing structured workflows and templates for every stage of the investment process. 

For example, pre-trade templates might require mutual fund managers to explicitly state their investment thesis, counter-arguments considered, and exit strategy before a trade is executed. 

Red-flag checklists, as advocated by firms like Schwab and American Century, can prompt managers to consider potential mutual fund risks or contrary evidence they might otherwise overlook due to confirmation bias. 

These structured steps make the decision-making process more robust and less susceptible to impulsive actions.

Protective Policies and Ethical Measures

Beyond internal systematic processes, the mutual fund industry operates under regulatory frameworks and adopts ethical measures to further safeguard investor interests and curb biased behavior among mutual fund managers.

1) Compliance and Transparency 

Regulatory bodies like SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) play a crucial role. SEBI regulations enforce strict portfolio disclosures, mandating that fund houses regularly publish their holdings. 

Furthermore, "side-pocketing" rules, for instance, ensure that any illiquid or distressed assets are segregated, and thus protecting existing investors from the immediate impact of a manager's potentially biased decision regarding a troubled asset. 

These regulations foster accountability among mutual fund managers.

2) Behavioral Audits

Some progressive Asset Management Companies (AMCs) go a step further by conducting internal behavioral audits. 

This might involve bias-awareness workshops for mutual fund managers and their teams, helping them recognize their own cognitive blind spots. 

Peer reviews of investment rationales also provide an additional layer of scrutiny, where colleagues can point out potential biases in each other's thinking.

3) Compensation Alignment

The way mutual fund managers are compensated can significantly influence their behavior. Incentive plans are increasingly structured to reward long-term performance rather than short-term gains. 

By aligning compensation with sustained, risk-adjusted returns over multiple years, fund houses discourage impulsive or excessively risky behavior driven by overconfidence or the desire for quick wins. 

This fosters a more patient and disciplined approach from mutual fund managers.

How do Investors Spot Biased Funds?

While it’s hard to see the internal workings of a fund house, investors usually look for certain signs that might indicate a fund is more susceptible to biases in its management, or conversely, has robust processes in place. 

This can help you make more informed decisions about which mutual fund managers to trust with your money.

1) Watching for Style Drift

Investors know that a fund's stated investment objective should align with its actual portfolio. 

If a large-cap fund suddenly starts shifting aggressively into mid caps or small caps without a clear change in mandate, it could signal that the mutual fund managers are chasing recent trends (recency bias) or displaying overconfidence in their ability to profit from riskier segments. 

Consistency in investment style is often a good sign.

2) Suspiciously Smooth Returns

While consistent performance is desirable, returns that appear suspiciously smooth, especially in volatile markets, might warrant a closer look. 

This could sometimes indicate hidden liquidity issues if the fund is holding illiquid assets, or perhaps a bias in how valuations are being reported, rather than genuinely superior, bias-free management. 

A truly well-managed fund will still experience some market fluctuations.

3) High Turnover Funds

Frequent buying and selling of securities (high portfolio turnover) can sometimes signal overconfidence bias or a tendency to chase returns. 

While some strategies naturally have higher turnover, persistently high turnover without a clear, justified reason can erode gains through transaction costs. 

This can potentially indicate mutual fund managers who are overly reactive to short-term market noise rather than sticking to a disciplined long-term strategy.

4) Check Fact Sheets and Offer Documents

Responsible fund houses often highlight their investment philosophy, governance practices, and process documentation in their fact sheets or scheme information documents. 

Look for mentions of investment committees, adherence to predefined risk frameworks, and systematic review processes. These details can give you insights into how the mutual fund managers operate and their commitment to mitigating biases.

Indus NZ's Role

Indus NZ is simplifying the investment journey with unbiased transparency and user-friendly features.

While Indus NZ focuses on providing access to a wide array of popular mutual fund categories in India, their platform is built on principles that align with good governance and investor protection. Check out how Indus NZ works. 

• Indus NZ currently offers access to over 500 mutual funds. Their emphasis on transparency ensures that you get clear information to help you evaluate mutual funds and the underlying processes that mutual fund managers employ.

• With a 1% lowest FX rate, investors can be assured they are receiving the full value of their investment.

• Furthermore, Indus NZ understands the importance of a smooth onboarding experience. Their KYC approval process can be completed in as little as 3 minutes.

• Crucially, you don't need to open an NRE account to invest through Indus NZ, further streamlining the process for NRIs. We work through the DTAA for you.

Remember, while Indus NZ currently focuses on mutual funds, they have plans to expand their offerings to include direct investments in India soon.

Conclusion

It's clear that even the most seasoned mutual fund managers are not immune to the pervasive influence of cognitive biases. 

These unconscious psychological shortcuts can subtly, yet significantly, impact investment decisions, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. 

However, the good news is that the mutual fund industry is increasingly aware of these challenges.

For investors, understanding these biases and knowing what signs to look for, such as consistent style, reasonable turnover, and transparent governance, becomes paramount. 

Ultimately, well-regulated funds with disciplined processes, guided by mutual fund managers who acknowledge and actively work to mitigate their biases, are typically better positioned to serve investors effectively over the long run.

Sign in to Indus NZ to invest in some of the mutual funds in India.

FAQs

1) What is a cognitive bias in mutual fund management?

A cognitive bias is an unconscious mental shortcut or error in thinking that can lead mutual fund managers to make irrational or suboptimal investment decisions, deviating from pure objectivity.

2) How does overconfidence bias affect mutual fund managers?

Overconfidence bias can lead mutual fund managers to trade excessively, take on too much risk, or ignore negative signals, believing their judgment is superior, potentially eroding returns over time.

3) Why are investment committees important for mutual fund managers?

Investment committees are crucial because group decisions dilute individual biases, fostering debate and challenging assumptions, which leads to more balanced and well-reasoned investment choices.

4) Can investors actually spot signs of bias in a mutual fund?

Yes, investors can look for signs like "style drift," unusually high portfolio turnover, or suspiciously smooth returns that might indicate unchecked biases, though direct observation is difficult.

5) How do regulations like SEBI help mitigate bias?

SEBI regulations enforce transparency through mandatory disclosures and set guidelines on fund operations and manager conduct, providing oversight and accountability that help curb bias.

Standard Disclaimer

Investing involves risk, and returns are not guaranteed. Please conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. This information is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

Indus does not provide investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. While we facilitate access to Indian mutual funds, any decision to invest is solely your responsibility. You should consult a qualified financial adviser or tax specialist before making any investment or tax-related decisions, especially if you are uncertain about how these investments apply.